CBCT Application in Dentoalveolar Trauma

by Yosef Nahmias, DDS, MSc; Ali Fatemi, DDS, MSc, FRCD(C)

Traumatic injuries to teeth and their supporting structures comprise approximately five percent of all traumatic injuries.1 Clinical and radiographic examinations are integral parts of diagnosis and treatment planning. Occlusal and periapical images have been suggested to determine the extent of damage to dentoalveolar structures. Due to their limitations as two-dimensional imaging modalities, it is necessary to take several images with different angulations to visualize the area of interest. Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has recently been used extensively in all aspects of dentistry. Several studies showed that CBCT is valuable in diagnosis of dental horizontal root fractures and alveolar fractures.2,3,4 According to the American Association of Endodontics (AAE), CBCT should be the imaging modality of choice for diagnosis and management of limited dento-alveolar trauma, root fractures, luxation, and/or displacement of teeth and localized alveolar fractures.5

The aim of this case report is to present two cases of dento-alveolar trauma showing the importance of having three-dimensional imaging for the diagnosis and treatment planning.

Case Report #1
A young male (21 years old) with recent trauma to face was referred for assessment of a loose maxillary incisor. Upon clinical examination, tooth 1.1 was mobile and tender to palpation and percussion with fingertip. Tooth 1.1 was nonresponsive to cold testing. A periapical radiograph revealed a horizontal fracture line at cervical third of the root (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
Pre-operative radiograph of tooth 1.1, revealing a fracture line at cervical third of root.

Pre-operative radiograph of tooth 1.1, revealing a fracture line at cervical third of root.

Treatment options of extraction or trying to save the tooth with splinting with guarded prognosis were presented and he chose to have the tooth splinted. The patient was advised to go for a CBCT to better investigate the location and direction of fracture line. The splint was placed and the patient was booked for six-week follow-up and review of the CBCT (Fig. 2).

Figure 2
Clinical photograph of splint applied to stabilize tooth 1.1.

Clinical photograph of splint applied to stabilize tooth 1.1.

The patient did not come to the follow-up appointment and did not respond to our calls and letters. Four months later, the patient contacted our office complaining of pain with tooth 1.1. He came in for a follow-up with a recent CBCT.

On the CBCT, two displaced fracture planes were present within the root of tooth 1.1. A horizontal fracture extended through the coronal third of the root at the level of the alveolar crest, and an oblique fracture extended from the buccal aspect of the apical third of the root to the palatal aspect of the cementoenamel junction (Figs. 3-5). This tooth was deemed non-restorable and the patient was informed that tooth 1.1 required extraction. No periapical pathology was present, but the buccal cortical plate was thin and partially dehiscent adjacent to tooth 11. Signs of internal resorption at apical third of root canal were also noted.

Figure 3
Sagittal view of CBCT, depicting two fracture lines involving tooth 1.1.

Sagittal view of CBCT, depicting two fracture lines involving tooth 1.1.

Figure 4
Coronal view of CBCT, illustrating two fracture line at coronal and apical thirds of tooth 1.1.

Coronal view of CBCT, illustrating two fracture line at coronal and apical thirds of tooth 1.1.

Figure 5
3D reconstruction feature of CBCT showing two fracture lines at tooth 1.1.

3D reconstruction feature of CBCT showing two fracture lines at tooth 1.1.

Case Report #2
A female patient (47 years old) was referred due to trauma to her anterior teeth. She had fallen and crowns of both 1.1 and 2.1 were displaced palatally (Fig. 6). Teeth were repositioned and splinted by her dentist, and soft tissue lacerations were sutured (Fig. 7). On clinical examinations both teeth were not responsive to sensibility tests. The periapical radiograph showed slight widening of periodontal ligament space. The patient was sent for a CBCT to rule out dentoalveolar fractures (Fig. 8).

Figure 6
Clinical pre-operative photograph of palatally displaced maxillary incisors.

Clinical pre-operative photograph of palatally displaced maxillary incisors.

Figure 7
Splint on Maxillary incisors.

Splint on Maxillary incisors.

Figure 8
Post-operative radiograph of maxillary incisors after splinting.

Post-operative radiograph of maxillary incisors after splinting.

On CBCT the anterior maxillary alveolar process showed a mildly displaced fracture, which extended through the buccal and palatal cortical plates adjacent to the midroot level of teeth 1.1 and 2.1 (Figs. 9-11). No signs of root fracture were present on teeth 1.1 and 2.1, but both teeth appeared to be subluxated (Fig. 12).

Figure 9
Coronal view of CBCT showing the fracture line.

Coronal view of CBCT showing the fracture line.

Figure 10
Axial view of Figure 11: Sagittal view of CBCT showing the fracture line.

Axial view of Figure 11: Sagittal view of CBCT showing the fracture line.

Figure 11
CBCT revealing the fracture line.

CBCT revealing the fracture line.

Figure 12
Sagittal view of CBCT showing widening of periodontal ligament space suggestive of subluxation.

Sagittal view of CBCT showing widening of periodontal ligament space suggestive of subluxation.

On the four-week recall, teeth 1.1 and 2.1 were not responsive to sensibility tests and were discolored. Root canal therapy was done on both teeth and the patient was referred back to her dentist to remove the splint (Fig. 13).

Figure 13
Post-operative radiograph of maxillary incisors after completion of root canal treatment.

Post-operative radiograph of maxillary incisors after completion of root canal treatment.

Proper diagnosis and treatment planning in dentoalveolar traumatic injuries require collection, analysis and interpretation of information gathered from clinical and radiographic examinations. CBCT technology is a fast and efficient modality to provide sufficient information in these situations. The above mentioned cases are showing that without a 3D image, we may not be able to see the exact extent of trauma and the patients may not receive proper treatment. OH

Oral Health welcomes this original article.


Dr. Yosef Nahmias was born and raised in Mexico City. After he had graduated from the Universidad Tecnologica de Mexico, School of Dentistry, in 1980 with a degree in dentistry, he decided to advance his education and chose Endodontics as his specialty. Dr. Nahmias has been a practicing Endodontist in Oakville, Ontario since 1983.

 

Dr. Ali Fatemi graduated in 2003 from Tabriz University in Iran and also completed his three-year Endodontic Residency there in 2005. In 2015, he was accepted in the Dental Specialty Assessment and Training Program at the University of Toronto. Currently, he is a fellow member of the Royal college of Dentists of Canada and a licensed Endodontist practicing in Oakville, Ontario.


RELATED ARTICLE: The Role of the Dentist in Recognizing Orbital and Ocular Trauma


Follow the Oral Health Group on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and LinkedIn for the latest updates on news, clinical articles, practice management and more!

RELATED NEWS

RESOURCES