Oral Health Group
Feature

Implantology: Implant Prosthetic Soft Tissue Model Fabrication

March 1, 2003
by Gregori M. Kurtzman, DDS, MAGD, MIPS/ICOI, FPFA, DICOI and Allen L. Schneider, DDS, FAGD, DICOI


Soft tissue contours are critical to fabrication of fixed and removable implant prosthetics. Without this information aesthetics and hygiene may be compromised in the final prosthetics.

To ensure that the emergence profile of fixed abutments replicates natural tooth aesthetics, the laboratory technician must be able to see the gingival margin and know the thickness of the soft tissue. Fixed prosthetics on natural teeth provides a margin at or slightly below the gingival margin. The resulting cast fabricated from the impression, is sectioned to provide individual dies. These dies are then ditched and marked to expose the die margins. Thus allowing the technician to wax and finish the metal portion of the abutment. Conversely, implant fixed prosthetic abutments utilize prefabricated metal components that are modified or cast. Soft tissue models can be fabricated in the laboratory or in the office. Soft tissue depth can vary due to bone loss and implant plateform placement. Often the width of the implant is significantly less then the needed cervical width of the restoration. Emergence profile may require the prosthetics to increase from 4mm at the plateform to 7mm at the cervical region with a soft tissue depth of 6mm or more. Without the soft tissue present for the technician it is difficult to determine where the cervical region needs to be placed, especially when natural teeth are not present in the arch adjacent to the implant.

Advertisement






Removable prosthetics retained with overdenture bars also present challenges with respect to hygiene and where the bar will connect to the abutment head. If the joint between the abutment head and bar is too close to the gingiva, seating of the bar may be difficult and chronic inflammation may result. A soft tissue model can provide valuable information to the technician allowing them to design the bar at the ideal height in relation to the soft tissue surrounding each abutment providing better long-term gingival health.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The healing screws are removed from the implants and impression heads are affixed (Figs. 1 & 2). A full arch Exaflex, polyvinyl siloxane impression (GC America, Alsip, IL) is taken in a stock plastic tray (GC America, Alsip, IL) (Fig. 3).

Implant analogs are affixed to the impression heads encased within the polyvinyl siloxane impression (Fig. 4). The cartridge of GI-Mask, (Coltene/ Whaledent, Mahwah, NJ) a silicone based soft tissue replicating material is bled prior to initial use. Bleeding the cartridge ensures that the two components will flow into the mixing tip without plugging the tip (Fig. 5). A mixing tip is placed on the cartridge and an intraoral tip is placed on the end of the mix tip (Fig. 6). The next step is critical to prevent adhesion of the GI-Mask to the polyvinyl siloxane as they are chemically similar and will bond. GI-Mask lubricant is sprayed over the entire impression and analogs (Fig. 7).

The GI-Mask is injected around each analog (Fig. 8). Material should be confined to the coronal third to allow sufficient length of the analog within the model stone. After completion of set, a scalpel is used to trim the mesial and distal of the soft tissue material to ensure that adjacent proximal contacts are in stone (Fig. 9). A die stone, Kromotypo 3, is then poured into the impression to complete the cast. (Kromopan USA, Inc., Des Plaines, IL) After setting it is trimmed and the soft tissue model is complete (Figs. 10 & 11).

CONCLUSION

Without the knowledge of where the gingival margin is the technician cannot determine where connector joints need to be placed in the framework or the emergence profile of fixed cases. Soft tissue modeling can provide critical information to the laboratory technician that can improve the aesthetics and hygiene of the completed implant prosthetics.OH

Dr. Kurtzman is in private practice in Silver Spring, MD and is an Assistant Clinical Professor at the University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry.

Dr. Schneider is in private practice in Springfield, VA. He is a consultant to various dental companies. He is also a consultant in prosthetics at the Veterans Administration at Martinsburg, WV.

REFERENCES

1.Chee W W, Cho G C, Ha S: Replicating soft tissue contours on working casts for implant restorations. J Prosthodontics, September 1997, Vol. 6, No. 3, p.218- 220.

2.Chee W W, Cho G C, Ikoma M M, A Arcidiacono: A technique to replicate soft tissues around fixed restoration pontics on working casts. J Prosthodontics, March 1999, Vol. 8, No. 1, p44-46

3.Obeid Y E, Driscoll C F , Prestipino V J : An alternative technique for an accurate implantretained prosthesis impression. J Prosthodontics, September 1999, Vol. 8, No. 3, p160-162

4.Finley J M: Restoring the edentulous maxilla using an implant-supported, matrix- assisted secondary casting. J Prosthodontics, March 1998, Vol. 7, No. 1, p35-39

5.Vocaturo AJ: Temporary beauty: achieving optimal results.Dent Today. 1996 Oct;15(10):90, 92-3.

6.Nayyar A, Moskowitz M, Pollard BL: Improving the emergence profile of dental restorations with accurate reproduction of soft tissue topography. J Esthet Dent. 1995;7(l):26-31

7.Pameijer JH: Soft tissue master cast for aesthetic control in crown and bridge procedures. J Esthet Dent. 1989 Mar-Apr; 1 (2):47-50.

8.Passon C: Enhanced prosthetics using the gingival mask. Oper Dent. 1992 May-Jun;17(3):101-5.

9.Chaimattayompol N: Simplified method for making a soft tissue mask for a working cast. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Jan;83(l):117-8.

10.Saba S: Soft tissue transfer models: the patient-dentist-laboratory connection. J Can Dent Assoc. 1998 Sep;64(8):584-5.

11.Beyak BL, Chee WW: Compatibility of elastomeric impression materials for use as soft tissue casts. J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Nov;76(5):510-4.

12.Williamson RT, Breeding LC, Kinderknecht KE: Soft tissue cast aids in establishing interproximal contours for restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Jun;69(6):630-1.

13.Martin D: Soft tissue, master cast. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1982;2(4):34-43.

14.Balshi TJ, Hancock RR: Soft tissue working cast. J Prosthet Dent. 1978 Mar;39(3):349-51.

15.Durkee RP: A technique for creating soft tissue models. Trends Tech Contemp Dent Lab. 1985 Apr;2(3):23-4.

Soft tissue modeling is critical for accurate aesthetics and hygiene when fabricating fixed and removable implant prosthetics. Gingival morphology is an important detail to be communicated to the laboratory technician. This article shall address a method of fabricating a soft tissue implant model.


Print this page

Related


Have your say:

Your email address will not be published.

*