December 14, 2020
by V. Thorburn, BMSc, MSc, DDS Candidate; C.S. Dong, DMD, BSc (Dent), MSc (Prosthodontics), FRCD(C) and M.R. Darling, BChD, MSc (Dent), MSc (Med), MChD
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a potentially debilitating and deadly disease, particularly when diagnosed at an advanced stage.1 Early detection drastically improves prognostic outcomes, making diagnosis a race against time.2 Most cases of OSCC begin as a precursor lesion or condition, classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as an “oral potentially malignant disorder (OPMD).”1 The WHO utilizes OPMD as a blanket term for all clinical oral presentations that carry a risk of cancer development (Table 1)1 – though not all disorders will inevitably transform to malignancy.3,4 Lesions commonly progress soon after initial diagnosis, with risk of transformation greatest during the first five years.5 A more detailed account of OPMD characterization can be found in Darling’s initial review of the psoriasin biomarker, published in the December 2018 edition of Oral Health.6
List of oral lesions and conditions classified as an oral potentially malignant disorder.
The potential risk associated with OPMD cancerous transformation constitutes a significant diagnostic challenge for dentists, often delaying preventive action.3 Clinicians must face the uncertain choice of i) monitoring or ii) surgically removing the lesion; with both options leading to potential negative patient outcomes.1 Known factors, like clinical appearance, can aid with the differential diagnosis of cancer risk, but are not always obvious and/or present.3 The multifactorial complexity of lesion progression, and the absence of distinct clinical indicators, correspond with a limited capacity for the early detection of high-risk lesions.
White lesions of unknown disease or disorder, referred to as leukoplakia, represent the most prevalent type of OPMD.1,4 These lesions are dynamic, and may vary over time in texture and/or colour.3 Clinically, oral leukoplakia can be subcategorized as homogeneous or nonhomogeneous. Homogeneous lesions appear uniformly white, or plaque-like, with a flat or wrinkled surface.3,4 (Fig. 1A) Nonhomogeneous cases may display a warty, nodular or verrucous surface (nodular/verrucous leukoplakia; Fig. 1B), or contain speckled regions of white and red patches (erythroleukoplakia; Fig. 1C).3,4 Red lesions, known as erythroplakia (Fig. 1D), are less common, but present as the highest malignant transforming OPMD.1,3,4 Other patient factors, specifically gender, tobacco use and lesion location, can also influence oral cancer risk.3
Fig. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D
Clinical presentation of the various manifestations of oral leukoplakia and erythroplakia lesions.
Lesion Histopathology and Dysplasia Grading
Standard assessment of OPMDs involves acquisition of a tissue biopsy for the histopathological evaluation of preneoplastic changes, referred to as oral epithelial dysplasia (OED).1 Lesion dysplasia is considered the most important prognostic factor of OPMD cancerous transformation. Wide use of the WHO three-tiered grading system stratifies OED into stages of mild, moderate and severe (Fig. 2); with an increase in grade (mild to severe) associated with a higher rate of malignant transformation.1
World Health Organization three-tiered histological dysplasia grading of oral potentially malignant disorders; defined by the number of affected epithelium thirds that exhibit atypical architecture and cell morphology.
This historical categorization of dysplasia grade is arbitrarily defined by the number of atypical oral epithelium thirds; generating a potential for significant i) overlap between grades,1,7 and ii) variability in intraobserver and interobserver scoring.8,9 Variations in pathologist interpretation of dysplasia presence, degree and significance have resulted in a reported examiner agreement ranking of poor-to-moderate.9,10 Consequently, many dysplasia cases do not align with the traditional correlation of dysplasia grade to malignant risk. Severe dysplastic regions may remain static or even regress, while mild dysplastic (or non-dysplastic) lesions have demonstrated malignant capability.11 The validity of dysplasia grading as an independent prognostic tool of oral cancer risk has therefore been challenged – as the presented limitations make it challenging for clinicians to confidently utilize dysplasia grading as a means to guide treatment.
The WHO has recommended application of an updated two-tiered binary dysplasia system to reduce user subjectivity.1,12,13 This revised system utilizes a numerical threshold of abnormal epithelial features (architectural/cytological) to differentiate between low and high-risk lesions – reclassifying cases of no, questionable, or mild dysplasia as low-risk, and cases of severe dysplasia as high-risk. Moderate dysplasias may be recategorized as low- or high-risk lesions.12,13 Limiting dysplasia classification to two categories could improve examiner correlation, amplifying reliability of pathologist diagnosis.
Clear guidelines for the monitoring and/or treatment of dysplastic OPMDs do not currently exist, obstructing patient care. Less than 5% of oral precursor lesions transform to OSCC annually.5 This, coupled with the perceived unpredictability of dysplasia risk assessment, often favours a conservative management of OPMDs.6 Oral cancer diagnoses and/or appropriate treatment accordingly occur at more advanced stages of malignancy, contributing to the high mortality rate of oral carcinomas.1 Elevated trust in OPMD cancerous risk assessment may motivate increased clinician use of preventive procedures, altering time frames for earlier intervention. This depends on the discovery of prognostic biomarkers, and development of a histologic and/or chairside test (using one or multiple biomarkers), to objectively predict the malignant transformation risk of oral lesions.
Numerous biomarkers have been recognized as prospective indicators of OPMD cancerous transformation, including but not limited to: i) hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes, ii) loss of genetic heterozygosity, iii) alterations in DNA content and iv) overexpression of psoriasin (S100A7).3,14,15 In recent years, psoriasin has received increasing attention for its proposed correlation to poor prognosis in OSCC patients;15 emerging as the favoured predictive biomarker for oral pre-cancer progression.
Psoriasin is a Ca2+-binding protein of the multigenic Ca2+-modulated S100 family, involved in the regulation of several cellular processes. In normal epithelium, psoriasin expression is most concentrated in the upper, well-differentiated spinous layer – suggesting a more pronounced role in cellular differentiation.16 Overexpression of psoriasin has been observed in several epithelial malignancies, including breast, lung, head and neck, gastric, bladder, cervical and ovarian cancers.17
Psoriasin expression has been experimentally evaluated in both cases of OSCC and OED.15,18 The correlation of total psoriasin presence in oral tumors, to specific clinicopathologic factors, has revealed a stable upregulation of its mRNA in small, well-differentiated, non-metastatic, early stage carcinomas; associating an increase in psoriasin expression with preliminary neoplastic changes.18 Amplified amounts of psoriasin have also been detected in i) a majority of malignant-transforming OED cases, and ii) oral squamous epithelial hyperplasia (prior to any evidence of dysplasia).15 This preneoplastic display of psoriasin demonstrates its enhanced prognostic ability to earlier discern vulnerable patients at greatest risk of malignant progression, through detection of molecular alterations that often precede morphologic changes. Ongoing research continues to analyze psoriasin expression profiles in other OPMDs, including chronic hyperplastic candidiasis.
The precise functional role(s) of psoriasin in OSCC malignancy has yet to be confirmed. A proposed protective role suggests that upregulation of psoriasin corresponds with increased expression of the epithelial adhesion molecule, E-cadherin. Cancer cells traditionally decrease E-cadherin expression to enable tumor migration and infiltration of distant tissue boundaries.19 It has therefore been theorized that the overexpression of psoriasin observed in premalignant lesions serves to stabilize E-cadherin expression, inhibiting cancer invasion.6 Potential carcinogenic functions of psoriasin in tumor differentiation and/or growth have also been described – possibly affiliated with more advanced stages of oral malignancy.6
The Straticyte™ Prognostic Test
Straticyte™ is a novel biomarker application established by Proteocyte AI (Toronto, Canada), that has demonstrated encouraging potential to deliver a personalized five-year risk assessment for the cancerous transformation of an OPMD. Quantitative measurement of the psoriasin biomarker (Fig. 3) is combined with computational algorithms to develop a lesion risk score; established through comparison to a reference database with more than 150 annotated oral dysplasia cases.7
Psoriasin (S100A7) as a prognostic biomarker for the risk assessment of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs). OPMDs displaying increased psoriasin expression (brown stain) are considered high-risk for malignant transformation.
Biopsy samples of OED are classified into three Straticyte™ grades (low-, medium- or high-risk) that exhibit minimal prognostic overlap.7 This promotes the efficient differentiation of risk categories, creating more defined boundaries for the classification of OPMDs at greatest malignant risk. Algorithmic calculations enable Straticyte™ to determine a specific risk range for each graded category, with a high score signifying a progression probability of greater than 55% over five years.7
Experimental use of Straticyte™ has illustrated a promising capability to accurately reclassify OPMDs of mild and moderate dysplasia (and uncertain risk) into defined low- or high-risk categories.7 This increase in the precise understanding of a patient’s oral cancer risk could ultimately guide clinicians to a more confident and supported treatment plan, favouring early detection and preventive action. It should be emphasized that additional exploratory studies are required to validate standard incorporation of Straticyte™ into the clinical assessment of cancer risk in oral lesions.
Future implementation of Straticyte™ (or other biomarker tests) into the clinical risk assessment of suspicious oral lesions should be used to complement, not replace, current methods of traditional dysplasia grading. Clinician appraisal of OPMD cancer risk can be strengthened by routine consideration of three fundamental assessment parameters: i) patient history, ii) clinical examination and iii) surgical biopsy, including histopathologic and biomarker analysis3,7 (Fig. 4).
Schematic outlining individual features of low- (green), medium- (yellow), or high- (red) risk at each stage of the clinical assessment process for oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs). Clinician appraisal of OPMDs should routinely consider three fundamental assessment groups: patient history, clinical examination and surgical biopsy.
The combined evaluation of multiple preneoplastic components can provide a more holistic, objective and assured assessment of OSCC risk, to better guide treatment. In the scenario where a patient presents with an OPMD of mild dysplasia but excessive amounts of psoriasin: an increased certainty of lesion progression is established, motivating the clinician to attentively monitor, or definitively remove, the dysplastic region.7 A case of severe dysplasia with high psoriasin would signify extreme malignant risk, prompting immediate excision of the lesion. OPMDs of severe dysplasia and low psoriasin may warrant continued surveillance.7 Incorporation of a prognostic biomarker(s), like psoriasin, into the diagnostic toolkit of OPMDs is on the imminent horizon, with great potential to heighten early cancer detection and improve patient outcomes.
Oral Health welcomes this original article.
About the Author
Victoria Thorburn is currently a second-year dentistry student at the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry at Western University, London, Ontario; mentored this past summer by Dr. Dong and Dr. Darling as a participant of the Schulich Dentistry Research Opportunity Program. Dr. Cecilia Dong is an Assistant Professor in the Division of Prosthodontics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry at Western University, where she is also the Dentistry Lead for Interprofessional Education. She is cross-appointed to the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and the Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery. Dr. Mark Darling is Professor, Division of Oral Pathology in the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry at Western University. He currently serves on the editorial boards of the journals Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology, Head and Neck Pathology and Case Reports in Dentistry. He is also an Associate Editor for the Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry.
RELATED ARTICLE: Significant Trends in Global Oral Health and Oral Cancer: The Power of Cultural Oral Habits
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
read more >>